![]() Has permission for the current reset action been granted?. Will false input parameters be “trapped” ?. Are the relevant authorization codes in place (in production)?. Does the sequence of the key-fields reflect the …. Have only key-fields been selected in the WHERE ?. Should a batch job be used for the deletion?. Are we talking about a large volume of data?. Can the data volumes to be deleted be reconstructed?. Has the agreement/instruction of the responsible party been procured?. Which working area is for the deleting data …. What gets deleted, and who OK’s the data for deletion?. A specific syntax is applicable, dependent on the. Table lines from a program-internal table. Short description of the “DELETE …” function. Sorted generation with simultaneous summation. Also the well-tried comparison can be of help. Process big tables and big data volumes using COLLECT?. Commands for processing summation in internal tables. Every “COLLECT” takes, what in the header line …. “COLLECT” in relation with a table used as parameter …. With “COLLECT” addition is done (also subtraction …. If not all header lines should be considered …. Extracts or compression from existing tables. Why is the number of needed table lines …. OCCURS instruction will be adapted internally. The “OCCURS instruction”, the paging area and the …. The “COLLECT” expands only when the argument …. The command “APPEND” always expands the table. The basical difference between “COLLECT” and “APPEND”. Concordance of the non numerical data fields. No concordance of the non numerical data fields. The result: congruent line found or not found. Comparison of the “search fields” (argument fields). COLLECT work1 INTO itab (up to Release 3.0 ). COLLECT makes sense only in connection with other commands. ![]() The different variations of “APPEND LINES …”. APPEND LINES OF itab1 FROM ind1 TO ind2 TO itab2. APPEND LINES OF itab1 FROM ind1 TO itab2. Omitting the specification of the FROM/TO area. Copying is targeted to the table end of itab2. Of course these course information are properly arranged in the learning tool.ĪPPEND LINES OF itab1 – syntax description, application notes. Please look at the volume of the respective course (… and show us something comparable …). These are mainly the headings of the single text elements. We subsequently listed the essential contents of each course as continuous text. call individual courses by using direct access or.follow the “red thread or learning path” or.You can determine the processing sequence of the single topics and you can: Of course these course information are properly arranged in the learning tool. They give an overview of the volume and the detailed structure of the presented knowledge. These are mainly the headings from the single text elements. The single topics of each lesson are subsequently listed here as a continuous text. 250 overlay drawings within the syntax explanations and during the debugging session. The report examples are illustrated through approx. 8500 lines in total and 77 ABAP programs. Prerequisite for this target however is, that these language elements are really understood. Within the language ABAP® it is sufficient to know only a few commands at the beginning to manage light programming requests. This course consists of a selection of ABAP® commands, which allow (together with course 1) you to also program bigger reports of an intermediate level. If you use a field symbol instead, it will be UNASSIGNED, which - again - might be what you intended - and then again maybe not.CT-Professional_100 – High-Quality-CBT Course 2: “Extension of language range and application” This might be intentional - the system has no way of knowing this. That variable won't be touched, it's just out of sync with the table. There is no "continuing with the next line" - with the addition INTO var you actually copied the entire line into your variable. will delete all of them, not just the current one - whether that is intended depends on your requirements.ĮDIT: To reiterate the "defined result": The current line is deleted. If your table can have multiple identical lines, your second variant DELETE lt_itab FROM ls_wa. in your example since the line to delete is the current one. If you use some statement within your check that changes sy-tabix as a side effect (for example, looking up some entry in a check table - or calling a function module/method that does so), you will end up deleting the wrong lines.īe aware that you can simply use the statement DELETE lt_itab. ![]() You can issue a CONTINUE statement right after the deletion to make sure that this is the case.ĭo not use DELETE lt_itab INDEX sy-tabix. It is usually safe if nothing else happens after the DELETE statement within the loop. It has a defined result, and it's up to you to use the commands correctly. Whether it is safe or not depends largely on your coding skills.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |